W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-flexbox] LCWD: Notifier call for review

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:47:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAKMeYjJZFSN3-1xMhixwLsZNR9uyzGLkc2L6eNRG+DpFGL8ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: CSS public list <www-style@w3.org>
It doesn't seem like a great choice. But I'm not going to object to
it. So I guess that's acceptance.

I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> Hello Timeless,
>
> In this message
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html
>
> you mentioned that in the cases where there are no explicitly
> baseline-aligned items, it would make more sense to use the main-axis
> baseline of the first item that has a baseline.
>
> This was discussed by the CSS WG back in September 2015, and after
> discussion was rejected as noted in the minutes:
>
>    RESOLVED: No change for baselines and flex and grid containers.
>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
>
> You were not explicitly copied on those minutes so may have been
> unaware that your comment was addressed. Hence this message - please
> reply back to www-style (copied) so we have an archived record of your
> acceptance of this resolution (or, of course, your objection if you do
> not agree).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Chris  Lilley
>  Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 00:47:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:52:33 UTC