- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:39:09 +0900
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 04:54, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On 17 Feb 2016, at 6:49 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Hello Tab, >> >> Tuesday, February 16, 2016, 7:53:29 PM, you wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >>>> Do you mean the existing CSS4 color function, or the function that >>>> used to be called icc-color? >> >>> Dont' worry about the existing CSS4 color() function, it's badly >>> designed and I need to overhaul it, and the name isn't necessarily >>> claimed. >> >> Oh, good to know. (And I agree it is nice functionality but needs >> work). >> >> OK, I claim color() so we don't have to call it icc-color() and upset >> people. > > I think we're now settled on color() for the function name, color-gamut > for the media-query name, and color-profile for the @rule that links > to an ICC profile. Agree on the first two. As for the @rule, should it be color-space instead of color-profile, since some spaces (CIELAB, CIEXYZ) are be defined without a profile? Or is this distinction not important to make, or am I making it at the wrong place? > Good work team! Not so fast... We can't be done bikeshedding nearly this early. :) > Dean
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 03:39:35 UTC