- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:24:18 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> On Feb 10, 2016, at 10:14, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> We don't generally care about groups which need *less* a11y help, so >> "reducing contrast" isn't really a use-case in the first place. ^_^ > > Actually it is. Not for people with low vision, but for people with > certain forms of dyslexia, high contrast can make the text appear > to be shining/sparkling/dancing, or just generally compound the > difficulty of differentiating certain letter shapes (p vs q) and > make things hard to read. > >> On the other hand, increasing contrast for "light-level: washed" is a >> good idea, *and* it can help with a11y that wants high-contrast. (It >> also generally means going with dark-on-light, which is better for >> low-sighted users too.) > > Luckily, this works in the other direction as well. The type of corrections > that people tend to apply in response to "light-level: dim" also correlate > well with the type of adjustment people with dyslexia favor: > * reducing contrast > * reducing blue light and going for a sepia / warm colors > * light-on-dark Good points! ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 04:25:05 UTC