- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:17:32 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:39 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Overall, the spec looks really good. I think we should take a cut of > it and ship Level 4 with everything that we're sure is stable, since > I think that's probably a lot of it. I just raised a few issues, but > they should be straightforward to solve imho, being mostly syntactic. > I say let's solve those, fill out 2.5. Combining Media Features, and > publish an LCWD. > > Stuff I vaguely remember (or are noted in the draft) as not being > 100% sorted as to whether they're the right approach: > - light-level > - inverted-colors > - custom MQ > > These I think should be deferred to Level 4 so as not to hold up the > rest of the features, some of which are desperately needed (like > pointer and hover). And of course we should continue to actively > work on them, and fold in the prefer-* stuff that's quite closely > related, use case wise, to the first two. We should definitively cut custom MQ from this level. I think inverted-colors is fine. It's simple, and addresses a realistic need presented in iOS devices. What problem do you have with light-level? Aside from the "should we also map a11y concerns to this", I think the feature itself is 100% stable and well-designed. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 01:18:19 UTC