- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:12:06 -0800
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> On Feb 6, 2016, at 03:56, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> hover: none | on-demand | hover >> >> Unless we can make 'on-demand' result in a boolean evaluation of "false", >> I think we should drop the value and classify such UAs as "hover: none". >> It seems like these UAs should be opted into @media not (hover) designs >> rather than @media (hover) designs. > > I agree, but I think Tab doesn't (he introduced this part), so I'd like > to hear his take on this. Yes, I disagree. on-demand hovering UAs *can* handle hover-based UIs, it's just not ideal. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 01:12:53 UTC