- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:55:26 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 03:56, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > hover: none | on-demand | hover > > Unless we can make 'on-demand' result in a boolean evaluation of "false", > I think we should drop the value and classify such UAs as "hover: none". > It seems like these UAs should be opted into @media not (hover) designs > rather than @media (hover) designs. I agree, but I think Tab doesn't (he introduced this part), so I'd like to hear his take on this. > We can note that :hover and hover events *can* trigger on such devices, > but nothing in the page should be designed for that mode of interaction. If my memory is correct, that was the initial definition of 'hover: none': either cannot hover at all, or cannot conveniently do so, so pages shouldn't depend on hovering to be usable, but they should also not depend on hover never happening. - Florian
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 02:55:53 UTC