W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-grid] Reduced Subgrid Proposal

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:49:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAt-XLy5wDgqEjAQeSuT04Xh6P2nFbUJFn+VeS_r2XPXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:32 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 09:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> Tab, the "complex case" you're talking about is exactly the one
>>> described in the OP...
>> Nope, the case in the OP is actually too over-simplified to be
>> problematic, as I explained in the thing you quoted.  The cell the
>> "subgrid" is going into is 1x1, so you don't need to subgrid at all
>> (at least, not against the page grid).
> You missed
>>   where main is a catalog whose columns line up with
>>   content in the header and footer (and therefore need
>>   to be part of the main grid)

That's not actually present in the presented grid, so I'm okay with
this. ^_^  The "more complex example" that I cited is indeed what you

Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 16:50:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC