- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:21:48 -0700
- To: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
- Cc: Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) <kochi@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: > (I and Tab chatted about this, but let me share my comment also here.) > > I no longer recommend to refer to the concept of "the tree of trees", which > is now a *non-normative* concept. > Recently, I have updated the Shadow DOM spec so that normative sections no > longer depend on the concept of "the tree of trees". > > Instead, I guess you can use "shadow-including tree order" [1], if you want > a well-defined order between nodes which share the same shadow-including > root [2], across node trees. > > [1]: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-shadow-including-tree-order. > [2]: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-shadow-including-root Ah, good, that is indeed what I need. I switched to that, and made the surrounding definitions more rigorous. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 17:22:36 UTC