- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:09:50 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Given unicode-range is already shipping > http://caniuse.com/#feat=font-unicode-range > I think #3 is a non-starter. You might have misread - #3 is explicitly backwards-compatible. It requires UAs to support the old syntax, it just doesn't describe how they would do so. > I would imagine that reparsing unicode-range tokens in order to make > the selectors work would be easier than doing #1, no? Hanging onto > unicode-range tokens would be a lot less memory than hanging onto > numbers and dimensions, given they're used so rarely. Yeah, it just means we have to reparse them everywhere *except* unicode-range. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 22:10:37 UTC