W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2016

Re: [css-flexbox] aspect ratio question

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:04:34 -0400
To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5702E4F2.4080101@inkedblade.net>
On 04/04/2016 05:10 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:52 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>
>> We did clarify the wording on how unresolveable percentages fall
>> into case B, to help make the percentage situation clearer:
>>    https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/342ac9d5c892
>>
>> Hopefully that helps. Let us know if that works, or if we can
>> do anything else to make this clearer.
>
> Thanks for the update, that helps. Two thoughts:
> - Instead of ['flex-basis' becomes ''content''.], maybe say [the used
> value for 'flex-basis' is "content".]?

Done.

> - To clarify, in https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#algo-main-item
> "or depends on its available size" is meant to catch min-content et
> al? (by the way, what about fill-available, is that definite?)

No, min-content et al. are intrinsic sizes and don't depend on the
available size. fill-available and fit-content depend on the available
size.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 4 April 2016 22:05:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:02 UTC