- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:17:39 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEV2_WYMsRnfgZG8YOpSq9uhxXR2dg1ZqqidA9C7-v_pC4UgKA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > > > > On 31 Aug 2015, at 04:09, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> > wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to extend the 'resize' property to apply to > > replaced elements? It'd be very useful on <iframe>s (and probably > > also on other things like videos and images). > > Currently, it does not apply because resize only applies to element with > overflow other than visible, but the overflow property does not apply to > replaced elements. > > Assuming it is web compatible, I'd be in favor of allowing it on iframes, > videos, and images, as they handle being resized quite well. Do you have a simple test case page/document demonstrating how you'd like to allow it on iframes, videos, and images? I'm kind of curious if there are any "accidental" or "experimental" implementations. However, I am less sure about for controls such as buttons and the like, > which are also replaced elements unless I am mistaken, but deal less well > with being resized, especially to a smaller size. > Similarly, it wouldn't hurt if you added such cases to the same document to see what would happen. > > Then again, even when resized too small, they do not overflow, so this > does not interfere with the resizing UI. So maybe it's ok. I'd like to hear > what others think. > In general I think it is worthy of consideration. Resizing videos and images seems like fairly "obvious" useful use-case (which is good), so there's at least that. And we could constrain this functionality accordingly. I'm having difficulty understanding how it could be a compat problem for users to simply be able to resize more things than they could before. Perhaps the presence of a "resizer" UI affordance could interfere with activating an element etc.? Could you provide more specifics about how it might not be web compatible? Thanks, Tantek
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2015 23:18:47 UTC