Re: [css-snappoints][css-scroll-snap] 1D vs. 2D (diagonal) snapping from Florian Rivoal on 2015-10-25 (www-style@w3.org from October 2015)

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:27:15 +0900
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>, Majid Valipour <majidvp@chromium.org>
Message-Id: <947C5F34-08DD-4644-92F4-4DF37C071B34@rivoal.net>

> On 25 Oct 2015, at 13:26, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>  scroll-snap-type: none | [ proximity | mandatory | trap ] ||
>                           [ x | y | block | inline | both | point ]
> 
> We have therefore incorporated this set of changes into our alternate
> model draft as well.

Makes sense to me. The fallback behavior you have specified for when the
author does not provide one of these value also seems reasonable.

 - Florian

Received on Sunday, 25 October 2015 05:27:51 UTC