- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:49:19 -0700
- To: Hyojin Song <hyojin22.song@lge.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Hyojin Song <hyojin22.song@lge.com> wrote: > On 08 Oct 2015, 07:43 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. < jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> The spec says that %s in the 'device-radius' media feature are >> resolved "proportional to the diameter of the screen". Rectangles >> don't have diameters, tho. What dimension should it be resolved off >> of? >> >> (I suspect width.) > > %s in the 'device-radius' have relevance to a horizontal radius and a vertical radius of the screen according to the length of width and height of the screen each. Thus I modified the expression from diameter to width and height, and added more. > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-round-display/#device-radius-media-feature This doesn't work; it assumes that the length/percentage is identical in both dimensions. If they're different, it's still undefined. Take an elliptical screen. It's 50% in both dimensions, but the <length>s are different. Or take a square screen whose corners are elliptical. Here, neither the <length> nor the <percentage> are the same across the two dimensions. You need to define a *single* way of measuring the size of the screen and the size of the curve, so we can resolve the <length> and <percentage> unambiguously. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:50:07 UTC