Re: [mediaqueries] CSS "prefers-" media features (from TPAC discussion)

Thanks Tab. Great to hear!

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm a jerk who sometimes doesn't do the work he promised to do.  I'll
> get this stuff together and into a spec soonish.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:31 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
>> It's almost a year since our initial discussion at TPAC 2014, but since TPAC
>> 2015 is coming up, I'm re-raising several visual design
>> accessibility-related media features we discussed last year.
>> 
>> Please don't let this thread derail into what designers "should" and "should
>> not" do. Visual design is subjective, and we take a realist approach to
>> accessibility: allow designers to design the primary user interface, while
>> allowing end users to adjust the interface to fit their needs.
>> 
>> On Oct 30, 2014, at 4:34 PM, James Craig wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for discussing this topic during the CSS WG meeting at TPAC. I think
>> it's important to raise the new distinction of a "prefers-" media feature as
>> opposed to an applied one. For example, some of the iOS 7+ and OS X Yosemite
>> (10.10) settings might be exposed as:
>> 
>> • prefers-reduced-motion
>> Allows certain views to remove or tone down animations. For example,
>> launching an app
>> on iOS 7 and iOS 8 changes to a subtle dissolve animation rather than a
>> full-screen zoom.
>> 
>> 
>> Platform preference is shipping on iOS, watchOS, and tvOS.
>> 
>> Customers regularly mention to us that common web site patterns (e.g.
>> horizontal carousels) cause vestibular issues such as dizziness or vertigo.
>> Web developers ought to be able to achieve a similar solution that app
>> developers can achieve natively.
>> 
>> Some background.
>> http://simplyaccessible.com/article/balance-awareness/
>> 
>> • prefers-reduced-transparency
>> Allows certain translucent views to switch to an opaque rendering.
>> 
>> 
>> Platform preference is shipping on iOS, OS X, watchOS, and tvOS. This
>> increases readability for certain individuals with vision impairments.
>> 
>> • prefers-differentiation-without-color (this media feature name needs work)
>> Allows certain views to change from color-dependent renderings. Messages
>> app on OS X changes
>> status icons from red/green/orange circles to red squares, green circles,
>> and orange triangles.
>> 
>> 
>> Platform preference is shipping on OS X, with some similar app-specific
>> settings on iOS. For example, change this setting on OS X, and the Messages
>> status icons change from colored circles to colored shapes. Mail on iOS has
>> a preference for flag shapes.
>> 
>> This can increase general usability and is obviously useful for people with
>> color-blindness, estimated at about 4% of the world's population.
>> 
>> Changing these user settings don't change the rendering of anything. It just
>> conveys a user preference that allows the frameworks, native apps, or web
>> apps to adjust for this user preference/desire/need.
>> 
>> I should also note these proposed names don't fit well within the "none or
>> truthy" pattern of some existing media features. It'd be awkward to specify
>> that "prefers-reduced-motion: none" means "user is okay with animation." The
>> none value here may be open to misinterpretation, so please consider a
>> "default" or "no-preference" value that behaves like "none" for boolean
>> comparisons.
>> 
>> prefers-reduced-motion: [ default | reduce ];
>> prefers-reduced-motion: [ no-preference | reduce ];
>> 
>> Thanks for considering,
>> James
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 02:01:02 UTC