- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:28:45 -0700
- To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Looks like WebApps agreed to drop the shadow-piercing stuff from CSS's >>>> dynamic profile anyway, so this thread is (luckily) moot. >>> >>> Even ::content? >> >> Ah, no, that part still exists. I'll see what problems still exist >> solely for ::content, if we ignore the existence of >>> and ::shadow. > > Removing >>> and ::shadow doesn't make this much simpler. My previous > post was solely about ::content. I did that on purpose. Shows that I didn't really read it. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Friday, 15 May 2015 22:29:35 UTC