- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 00:26:52 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Looks like WebApps agreed to drop the shadow-piercing stuff from CSS's >>> dynamic profile anyway, so this thread is (luckily) moot. >> >> Even ::content? > > Ah, no, that part still exists. I'll see what problems still exist > solely for ::content, if we ignore the existence of >>> and ::shadow. Removing >>> and ::shadow doesn't make this much simpler. My previous post was solely about ::content. I did that on purpose. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Friday, 15 May 2015 22:27:20 UTC