W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2015

Re: [css-flexbox] intrinsic sizing

From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 21:11:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XEgxhXkE3cOfTowFDBwO61HrhUQ5wC1yx7J2nRak_N2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:30 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure why your concern about about 3 is any different from 1.
> You're quoting from here, right?
>   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes
>
>   # 1. For each flex item, subtract its flex base size from its max-content
>   #    contribution size...
>   # 3. Add each item’s flex base size to the product of its flex grow
> factor...

Tab has already changed the spec and I no longer have an issue with it :-)

That said, you are both right that even before the change it wouldn't
need layout; I was wrong.

-christian
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2015 01:12:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:54 UTC