- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 17:30:33 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/06/2015 03:45 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote:> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Christian Biesinger > <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> Let me know if that addresses your concern. >> >> Yes... it does. (As a sidenote, why is flex-basis: available not >> definite? http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#definite) > > After re-reading, there is another part here that requires layout to > calculate the intrinsic size, I think: > "3. Add each item’s flex basis [...]" > > The flex basis here may require layout, right? (flex-basis: content) I'm not sure why your concern about about 3 is any different from 1. You're quoting from here, right? http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes # 1. For each flex item, subtract its flex base size from its max-content # contribution size... # 3. Add each item’s flex base size to the product of its flex grow factor... ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2015 00:31:04 UTC