- From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 19:27:07 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Christian Biesinger > <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Christian Biesinger >> <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Christian Biesinger >>> <cbiesinger@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>>>> Let me know if that addresses your concern. >>>> >>>> Yes... it does. (As a sidenote, why is flex-basis: available not >>>> definite? http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#definite) >>> >>> After re-reading, there is another part here that requires layout to >>> calculate the intrinsic size, I think: >>> "3. Add each item’s flex basis [...]" >>> >>> The flex basis here may require layout, right? (flex-basis: content) >> >> Or maybe flex basis should say "flex base size"...? > > "flex basis" is just the 'flex-basis', or the 'width'/'height'. "flex > base size" is the one more likely to require layout; it's the value > calculated by 9.2.3 and then clamped to get the hypothetical main > size. But how would you calculate "flex-basis: content" here without layout? -christian
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 23:27:34 UTC