- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:45:44 -0700
- To: Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On May 3, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net> wrote: >>> On May 1, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net> wrote: >>> >>> If the feature resets to the previous origin. Why not call it like it >>> is: >>> 'origin'? Or 'reset-origin'. But 'reset' doesn't have much value either. >> >> IMO, 'origin' adds to the confusion, because it makes me wonder, "what >> origin"? > > That's the intent. Just like you need to know what 'initial' means. The intent is to add confusion??? I think the meaning of 'initial' is much more guessable than 'origin' in this context.
Received on Monday, 4 May 2015 15:46:15 UTC