- From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:33:52 -0400
- To: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Thanks, I'll do the same. I was wondering if I should stretch it anyway even though it doesn't technically participate in flex layout. baseline is also the same as flex-start, I assume. Would be nice if the spec was a bit more explicit about it! -christian On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Hi there, > >> I'm working on implementing the new abspos behavior, as described in http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#change-2012-static-pos and >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#abspos-items > >> I just wanted to verify what the expected behavior of align-self: >> stretch on an absolutely positioned item is. Should it be converted to flex-start or should the abspos item be stretched? I assume the former? > > We convert it to flex-start since the abspos items don't participate in the flex layout, all of them would end up in the start position. > >> thanks! >>-christian >
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 16:34:20 UTC