- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:17:31 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 26/03/15 10:46, Mats Palmgren wrote: >> There are no abspos grid items. ^_^ > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid/#abspos-items > The very title of 9.4 is "Absolutely-positioned Grid Items" > so you started it :-p > > I don't think it's such a bad term. We need something shorter > than "an absolutely positioned element who's containing block > is generated by a grid container". The spec just needs to state > clearly that such items do not affect the formation of the > implicit grid in any way. I think it's good that the term > includes "grid item" because much of the spec defines how grid > items behave. For example, "Placing Grid Items": > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid/#placement > Why should that chapter apply to abs.pos. if they are not grid > items? > > I don't feel strongly about it though - I'll use whatever term > the spec uses ;-) I already suggested [1] to use "9.4. Absolutely-positioned Grid Container Children" in order to match with section "4.3. Static Position of Grid Container Children". My 2 cents, Rego [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0362.html
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:18:04 UTC