- From: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:19:46 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
*haha* :-)) Thank you, Glen. Hmm, that sounds like great idea! I'd fervently be looking forward to see it! And I suggest you hang on to see my next future suggestion then ;) Cheers, Axel -------------- "Glen Huang" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:A3240994-FF8A-4443-89B3-9EC44CFB27CD@gmail.com... I’m not in the WG, and have no comment on the proposal, but just can’t help to marvel at the video. It's so professionally done. You made a freaking video (and not so short) for just a proposal, and it even changes the camera angle while you talk! I really need to think about how I should make a proposal next time (probably only a 3D game in which things float in the mid air playing my proposal would trump it). ;) > On Mar 17, 2015, at 10:09 PM, Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I've been trying to implement smooth scrolling by means of CSS3 > transitions. > > Doing so I noticed that the current specification lacks specifying a > satisfying path on how interrupted transitions should be implemented to > provide a smooth segue from transition to transition. > > In the development edition of the specification a suggestion has been > introduced to cope with this situation. However, the solution presented > therein doesn't seem comprehensive nor satisfying. > > > I'd like to suggest a different approach to interrupted transitions. > > Given transition #1 will change property value (a) to property value (b) > and the adjoining transition will change the currently transitioned value > (c) to (d), my approach will apply to any kind of interrupted transitions: > > * Reversed Transitions > { (d) between (c) and (a) or (d) beyond (a) } > > * Continued Transitions > { (d) near or beyond (b) } > > * Interrupted Transitions > { (d) near (c) } > > > > A documentation to my suggestion can be found here: > > https://youtu.be/ssiQYof5YLQ > > My sample JavaScript code, simulating the suggestion interrupted > transition behaviour can be found here: > > http://jsfiddle.net/qLL607g8/ > > > > RFC, > Axel Dahmen > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 17:20:42 UTC