W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2015

Re: [css3-ui] file formats for the cursor property

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:01:34 +0100
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Message-Id: <E9F3A6BC-8020-4116-AC5B-751DB63219D2@rivoal.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>

> On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:52, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>>> On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:22, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 13 Mar 2015, at 22:14, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
>>>>>> As for external references in SVG, may or must not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's already handled; external refs aren't allowed when invoked as a
>>>>> CSS image, as that uses the "secure static" or "secure animated" form.
>>>> 
>>>> Cool, so that's settled. By the way, as long as we're handling animated (images, SVGs) as a should, we can probably put .cur as a should as well.
>>> 
>>> Why? I thought you said everyone supports .cur; that implies we should MUST it.
>> 
>> Sorry, I must have been tired when I wrote that. I meant .ani (the animated version of .cur).
> 
> Ah, ok.  Eh, I can take it or leave it.  Supporting animation in a
> format that you already support animation in is different from
> supporting an additional file format just for animation purposes.  I'd
> prefer we not mention it, probably, except maybe in a note.

Microsoft, if you'd like .ani to be mentioned as more than a note, this is the time to make your case.

 - Florian
Received on Saturday, 14 March 2015 00:01:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:30 UTC