- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:21:41 -0700
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > As noted in the associated issue[1], we need to define how ''continue: discard'' works when the element it is applied to isn't already a fragmentainer. > > Rather than defining a new model according to which things may become fragmentainers, I am thinking the I should use the same approach as "continue: fragments" and create a fragment box, the only difference being that you'd only get one, rather than a sequence of fragment boxes. > > This implies that ::nth-fragment(1) would work on it, which I think is fine. > > Can I go ahead and spec it this way, or does anyone think I should take another approach? This seems reasonable to me. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 13 March 2015 21:22:28 UTC