As noted in the associated issue[1], we need to define how ''continue: discard'' works when the element it is applied to isn't already a fragmentainer. Rather than defining a new model according to which things may become fragmentainers, I am thinking the I should use the same approach as "continue: fragments" and create a fragment box, the only difference being that you'd only get one, rather than a sequence of fragment boxes. This implies that ::nth-fragment(1) would work on it, which I think is fine. Can I go ahead and spec it this way, or does anyone think I should take another approach? - Florian [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-overflow/#issue-36be54beReceived on Wednesday, 11 March 2015 22:19:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:49 UTC