- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:50:13 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> On 13 Mar 2015, at 13:37, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > On 13/03/15 11:31, Florian Rivoal wrote: > >> Fantasai has rejected this pull request, saying it should be added to level 4 since level 3 is in CR. >> [snip] >> Thoughts? > > Elika is right. Process section 7.4.1 is very clear about the reasons > and the process to revise a CR and your proposal is a "substantive > change" that would require an approval from the Director... Right, I was a bit to quick here, and have no intention to throw us into complicated process things. > Since the property is at-risk in L3 anyway, here's my recommendation: > reevaluate now the "at-risk" status of the property and its likelyhood > (or not) to be dropped before requesting a PR. If it is still likely to > be dropped, remove it from L3 and move the whole thing to a new L4 > draft (you need a WG approval for that new ED). That sounds good to me. I'd rather avoid having an unimplemented property being defined differently in different specs, so putting it all in L4 sounds good. - Florian
Received on Friday, 13 March 2015 12:50:38 UTC