- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:28:18 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/02/2015 03:58 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 02/17/2015 08:28 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: >> Consider the following jsfiddle: >> http://jsfiddle.net/jL7t19nd/1/ > [...] >> >> QUESTION: What is the first flex item's "flex base size" -- is it 80px, >> or 500px? Specifically, does its "max-width" impact how its contents are >> measured, to establish its flex base size? > > As noted elsewhere*, I discussed this issue with Tab/fantasai/Greg/Rossen today, and they confirmed that my understanding on this issue is correct (and the Chrome behavior on this jsfiddle is a bug). > > The spec needs a tweak to clarify sections 9.3.3 D & E to make it clearer that the "lay out the item" steps there should *exclude* any clamping using the flex item's min/max size in the main axis. We updated the spec like this: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/bb36bb56bc52 Let us know if something else would be better. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 21:28:47 UTC