- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:07:16 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 3:42 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> On 02/28/2015 07:22 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> >> P.S. I think it is kind of unfortunate that having 'border-style:none' changes the computed value of border-width to 0, >> regardless of what the author sets, since I think that is why border-style has to be explicitly set in order for >> 'border-image-width:[number]' to work. But I imagine it is way too late to change that. But could we have border-image-width >> use the cascaded value of border-width instead of the computed value? > > Well, we could make the computed value be its specified value and > the used value be zero, but I'm not sure if that's a Web-compatible > change. Not sure how to evaluate that either, other than to implement > it and see what breaks... Yeah, it might be too late. It doesn't seem super likely that people are relying on the behavior for border-image much, but maybe people are checking and setting border-width and border-style in JS and expecting them to work interchangeably at zero. It could be tested under an experimental flag, I guess, if implementors were willing.
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 15:07:46 UTC