- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:59:04 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 3:39 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> On 03/01/2015 12:22 AM, Daniel Tan wrote: >> >> border-style serves as a fallback for when the image cannot be loaded or when border-image is not supported. If the behavior >> of border-width were to change depending on the presence of a border image when border-style is none, this could have adverse >> effects on layout. > > Per spec, the layout is required to not change regardless of 'border-image': > the 'border-image-width' only sets the area used for the "border" areas of > the image -- it doesn't affect the border width for the purposes of layout > or background positioning. Oh yeah, that's right.
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 14:59:33 UTC