> > fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 2015-06-27 20:41:43 > > On 06/26/2015 08:25 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Recently, Masayuki mentioned that, for Japanese, if a piece of > > > text in vertical writing mode has both ruby and underline, the > > > underline should be outside ruby annotation, like: > > > > > > 分わ| > > > か | > > > る | > > > > > > However, implementors who are not aware of this will tend to implement > that as: > > > > > > 分|わ > > > か| > > > る| > > > > > > (This is actually the current behavior of Firefox Nightly) > > > > > > I know the current spec says the exact position of underline is > > > UA-defined, but I guess it at least worths a note. Actually, I > > > don't think this is a behavior could be covered by "UA-defined". > > > > > > As an implementor, I feel it looks hard to implement, but probably > > > not something impossible. > > > > > > Also it seems to me this is not mentioned in JLReq. I guess we > > > should also cc people there and ask their opinion about this. > > > > Good point. I agree with asking the JLTF to put a clarification > > into JLREQ--for this situation in both horizontal and vertical > > text--and we should follow up by figuring out a good model for > > handling this in CSS. I'm not 100% sure what that should be, as > > there might also be cases where the underline should go between > > the ruby and the base. > Agreed that having a clarification in JLREQ is good. >From top of my heads, I agree with Murakami-san; the current behavior of Firefox Nightly looks good to me. /kojiReceived on Sunday, 28 June 2015 16:17:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:55 UTC