W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2015

Re: [css-ui-3] box-sizing: padding-box

From: Jonathan Kingston <jonathan@jooped.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:49:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKrjaaXM=bVCnzaQ86Ltw74uFDzxpE-uZepohkv9yRrM0C=b3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Florian,

Firstly thank you for asking, this is not a game changer at all for me as I
say it can be implemented using calc. (Also thanks for understanding I
meant padding-box too).
The one use-case that I had recently was implementing a variable padding
based on page context on a fixed width avatar element.

I'm more interested in talking about implementing a margin-box which would
have to be future levels of the specification if it were to ever be
considered (I'm convinced that there won't be implementor interest either).

So yes, please progress forward as the lack of padding-box doesn't
specifically harm me.

Kind regards
Jonathan

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:53 PM Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:

>
> > On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:40, Jonathan Kingston <jonathan@jooped.com> wrote:
> >
> > I can think of a few use-cases for border-box mostly that could be
> solved with calc however as mentioned removes meaning.
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Due to lack of implementor interest, the working group has decided to
> stick by
> it's previous resolution to drop the padding-box value of the box-sizing
> property.
> We can always reintroduce it in a future level of the specification if
> there is
> enough interest then.
>
> In order to move the specification forward, we would appreciate if you
> could
> let us know if this is something you can live with.
>
>  - Florian
>
>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 18:50:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:55 UTC