W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2015

Re: css-grid] feedback

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:22:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCu4ksd1jCSSd-C91ufs7_aTfLoiGEbe4B=b9knF2C8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Trilford <michael@boost.co.nz>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Michael Trilford <michael@boost.co.nz> wrote:
> grid-column: 1 / 2 and grid-row: 1 / 2 feedback.
> I'm still torn on this, when designing, I never refer to my vertical columns
> as grid lines. They are columns 1 - 12 for example.

There's nothing wrong with that, and the syntax supports only thinking
of it in terms of rows/columns.  Just use the row/column index first,
and set the row/column width as a span second, like "grid-column: 1 /
span 3" for an item that starts in the first column and is three
columns wide.

The reason we based Grid on lines is because there are use-cases for
both types of references, and it's easier to think about rows/columns
in terms of lines than the opposite.

> When I span across multiple columns in my grid, I usually reference class
> name that uses a fraction. .col-2-3
> In a two column layout of a 4 column grid, one column 1 may span 3 and the
> other column will span 1. I would reference that as .col-3-4 & .col-1-4.

You can still do that in Grid, just set "grid-column-end: span 3;", etc.

(Note that older "css grids" had to bake the grid width into the class
names, because they were building a grid from the bottom up; there was
no actual grid to interact with, just a bunch of floated elements
interacting with each other.  That's unnecessary now.)

Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2015 16:22:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:54 UTC