- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:11:53 -0700
- To: Pontus Horn af Rantzien <pontus.horn@fintab.se>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Pontus Horn af Rantzien <pontus.horn@fintab.se> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 at 22:33 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Prompted by plh, Tab and I just went over the Selectors 4 spec, >> to figure out what's ready to polish up and send to CR and what >> looks like it should stay in WD. Here's a list of what we propose >> to keep and defer: > > What's the latest word on :nth-[last-]match()? Is that looking to make it to > CR? We dropped that a long time ago, in favor of folding the functionality into :nth-child(). And that is on the list as something to review for inclusion in 4 vs 5. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 16:12:40 UTC