- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:30:30 -0400
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Prompted by plh, Tab and I just went over the Selectors 4 spec,
to figure out what's ready to polish up and send to CR and what
looks like it should stay in WD. Here's a list of what we propose
to keep and defer:
Keep:
* Everything in Level 3, obviously
* case-insensitive attribute selectors
* :matches(), :not()
* :dir(), :lang()
* :any-link, :current, :past, :future
* CSS UI selectors, possibly other than :read-only / :read-write (see below)
* :user-error
Defer to L5 or Need More Info to Decide
? :has()
Propose to defer.
? :focus-within
Will keep if there's impl interest
? :drop and :drop()
No idea, need info on impl status / interop
? :read-only and :read-write
Vaguely recall someone wanting to drop this...
? :placeholder-shown
Need to check impl status
? :blank
Need to check impl status, would prefer a new name
(that doesn't evoke empty input fields)
? :nth-child( An+B of <selector> )
Want to double-check satisfaction with syntax, impl interest
? >> descendant selector
Bias towards dropping, want to check with implementers
? Column combinator
Want to double-check satisfaction with syntax, impl interest
? :nth-column() pseudo-class
Biased to at-risk
Please send your thoughts on this list. :)
~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 20:30:58 UTC