- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:30:30 -0400
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Prompted by plh, Tab and I just went over the Selectors 4 spec, to figure out what's ready to polish up and send to CR and what looks like it should stay in WD. Here's a list of what we propose to keep and defer: Keep: * Everything in Level 3, obviously * case-insensitive attribute selectors * :matches(), :not() * :dir(), :lang() * :any-link, :current, :past, :future * CSS UI selectors, possibly other than :read-only / :read-write (see below) * :user-error Defer to L5 or Need More Info to Decide ? :has() Propose to defer. ? :focus-within Will keep if there's impl interest ? :drop and :drop() No idea, need info on impl status / interop ? :read-only and :read-write Vaguely recall someone wanting to drop this... ? :placeholder-shown Need to check impl status ? :blank Need to check impl status, would prefer a new name (that doesn't evoke empty input fields) ? :nth-child( An+B of <selector> ) Want to double-check satisfaction with syntax, impl interest ? >> descendant selector Bias towards dropping, want to check with implementers ? Column combinator Want to double-check satisfaction with syntax, impl interest ? :nth-column() pseudo-class Biased to at-risk Please send your thoughts on this list. :) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2015 20:30:58 UTC