- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:30:20 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
On 7/20/15, 2:06 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >Hi everyone, >Tab and I just finished compiling a first draft of the 2015 Snapshot copy. >We haven't incorporated the new specs into the indexes (it's still the >2010 set), but we updated the intro, the process summary, and most >importantly > > We updated the prefixing policy to reflect the San Diego 2012 >resolutions: > http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2012/08/30/resolutions-53/ > >Many thanks to Florian Rivoal for the initial draft of the new policy. > >Here's a link to the Editor's Draft: > http://drafts.csswg.org/css-2015/#experimental > >We're hereby requesting that the CSSWG review and, if the wording is an >acceptable representation of the resolutions, approve the new policy. Looks good to me. Two editorial nits: Even though I know what CR is, on first glance I read “pre-CR” as a single point in time. It might be better as “pre-CR-level,” but you just defined “unstable” above, so we could change the first sentence of point 1 to: 1. Unstable features that are not yet interoperable should not be released in production software… Then I’d change the “vendors should” in point 2 to “vendors MUST” :) Thanks, Alan
Received on Monday, 20 July 2015 21:30:51 UTC