- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:58:27 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/20/2015 05:30 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: >fantasai wrote: >> Here's a link to the Editor's Draft: >> http://drafts.csswg.org/css-2015/#experimental > > Looks good to me. Two editorial nits: > > Even though I know what CR is, on first glance I read “pre-CR” as a single > point in time. It might be better as “pre-CR-level,” but you just defined > “unstable” above, so we could change the first sentence of point 1 to: > > 1. Unstable features that are not yet interoperable should not be released > in production software… Fixed. Thanks~ > Then I’d change the “vendors should” in point 2 to “vendors MUST” :) While I appreciate the sentiment, I'm not convinced we need to make vendors non-conforming for this--it seems more of a a quality-of-vendor issue. :) ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 20 July 2015 22:58:56 UTC