- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:56:05 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > On 7/2/15, 3:27 AM, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >>> On 02 Jul 2015, at 00:31, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >>> How about: >>> >>> If a fragmentation context participates in layout containment, the first >>> element with layout containment affecting the fragmentation context must >>> “trap” the remainder of the fragmented flow. Fragmentation must not >>> continue past the layout containment boundary. So the last fragment >>> container within the first layout containment boundary is treated as if >>>it >>> is the last fragment container in its fragmentation context. >> >>Not bad :) You took something awkward to phrase, generalized it to a >>broader >>situation, and still managed to craft a sentence that makes sense. >> >>I'd add: >> >> If subsequent fragmentation containers in the fragmentation context >> are only generated when more content remains in the fragmented flow, >> then they are not generated. If they would exist regardless, they >> remain part of the fragmentation context, but do no receive any content >> from the fragmented flow. >> >> Specifically: >> - CSS Regions following the one which traps the content are still >> considered part of the region chain as returned by the >> getRegions() method of the NamedFlow interface. >> - the regionOverset attribute of the Region interface of the region >> which traps the content is set to overset if the content doesn't >> fit, even if it is not the last region in the region chain. >> - If the computed value of the continue property on an element with >> layout containment would otherwise have been ''auto'' or >> ''fragments'', it must instead compute to ''overflow''. > > This all looks good to me. I like the general rules followed by specific > applications of those rules. I like this as well, and would gladly accept a PR. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 21:56:52 UTC