- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:36:19 -0500
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/13/2014 01:09 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2014-10-13 10:01 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Oct 13, 2014 9:57 AM, "Simon Sapin" <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: >>> http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/#intrinsic has a definition of >> max-content (preferred intrinsic width) that is not circular and does not >> involve layout. >> >> Preferred and max-content are not identical in all cases. > > Really? In > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007OctDec/0267.html > we resolved to rename the concept there to max-content. We did. And then we realized there are two very similar concepts that are identical except for multi-col elements. preferred-size for a multicol with both column-width and column-count is column-width*column-count. However its max-content size can be larger than that, since the column-width functions as a minimum and will grow as the container grows. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2015 00:37:14 UTC