W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Where is the "complete document"

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:31:48 -0500
Message-ID: <54C2AFB4.2040406@inkedblade.net>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/23/2015 10:47 AM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> Hello Tab,
> Thursday, January 22, 2015, 11:22:35 PM, you wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2015 06:36 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>> Woah, *that's* an old document.  It'll celebrate its 14th birthday
>>> Yet still one of the top results on popular search engines for "css3
>>> specification".
>> Holy crap you're right, it's the 4th result for me.  Let's... get that
>> slapped with an obsoletion notice.
>> Peter, Daniel, who can I talk to about maintaining that document?  It
>> desperately needs a notice that it's an old and out-of-date document
>> that should only be referenced as a historical artifact.
> Its a working draft so can be updated with new content (or made into a
> note, or both) at any time.
> Making it into a gutted note is probably the best option.

Better yet: turn it into a 301 Redirect to /TR/CSS, which
is the actual replacement for it.

(That also needs to be updated, but that's a separate issue.)

Chris, can W3C do 301 redirects on /TR/shortname? I haven't had
much success with requests to webreq to that effect.

Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 20:32:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:47 UTC