Re: Where is the "complete document"

On 01/23/2015 10:47 AM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> Hello Tab,
>
> Thursday, January 22, 2015, 11:22:35 PM, you wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Sam Pinkus <sgpinkus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2015 06:36 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>> Woah, *that's* an old document.  It'll celebrate its 14th birthday
>>>
>>> Yet still one of the top results on popular search engines for "css3
>>> specification".
>
>> Holy crap you're right, it's the 4th result for me.  Let's... get that
>> slapped with an obsoletion notice.
>
>> Peter, Daniel, who can I talk to about maintaining that document?  It
>> desperately needs a notice that it's an old and out-of-date document
>> that should only be referenced as a historical artifact.
>
> Its a working draft so can be updated with new content (or made into a
> note, or both) at any time.
>
> Making it into a gutted note is probably the best option.

Better yet: turn it into a 301 Redirect to /TR/CSS, which
is the actual replacement for it.

(That also needs to be updated, but that's a separate issue.)

Chris, can W3C do 301 redirects on /TR/shortname? I haven't had
much success with requests to webreq to that effect.

~fantasai