W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

RE: Inconsistency in flex-basis?

From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:10:53 +0000
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shashi Gowda <shashigowda91@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB0868213390FA2C30BBCBEC06A4360@BN3PR0301MB0868.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 On 01/23/2015 10:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> > That's not right.  The spec algo should shrink them to 0.  If they
> > have a definite flex-basis, their widths are *totally ignored*
> In Firefox at least, we've already got a bug on this:
>   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=972595

> We use the items' "width" property, when computing the intrinsic size of the
> flex container -- but we should instead be looking at their 'flex-basis'.  (Or
> really, we should be following the recently-added flex-grow-and-shrink-
> dependent flex-container intrinsic sizing spec-text at
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes.)

Thanks for the bug link. I'm assuming this is the correct Blink bug on this (https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=249112)?


Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 20:11:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:47 UTC