- From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:10:53 +0000
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Shashi Gowda <shashigowda91@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/23/2015 10:20 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > That's not right. The spec algo should shrink them to 0. If they > > have a definite flex-basis, their widths are *totally ignored* > > In Firefox at least, we've already got a bug on this: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=972595 > > We use the items' "width" property, when computing the intrinsic size of the > flex container -- but we should instead be looking at their 'flex-basis'. (Or > really, we should be following the recently-added flex-grow-and-shrink- > dependent flex-container intrinsic sizing spec-text at > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/#intrinsic-sizes.) Thanks for the bug link. I'm assuming this is the correct Blink bug on this (https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=249112)? Greg
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 20:11:22 UTC