- From: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:57:43 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:22, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 05:20 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:18 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: >> >>> Cameron McCormack wrote: >>>> Is there any reason not to have logical versions of the border radius >>>> properties? >>> >>> dbaron points out to me that the names of the properties would be pretty bad, if we follow the existing naming scheme: >>> border-block-start-inline-end-radius, etc. >> >> Maybe when having to give both in a property name, we could make it contextual so that block is first, inline is second, i.e. >> border-start-end-radius ? > > I think this makes sense, personally. > > ~fantasai Me too. Btw, while we’re at it, we should also add those side border-radius properties (border-top-radius, border-right-radius etc) we discussed a while ago. [1] ~Lea [1]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0314.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 16:58:52 UTC