- From: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:02:49 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 17:03:16 UTC
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 05:20 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:18 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> >> wrote: >> >> Cameron McCormack wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any reason not to have logical versions of the border radius >>>> properties? >>>> >>> >>> dbaron points out to me that the names of the properties would be pretty >>> bad, if we follow the existing naming scheme: >>> border-block-start-inline-end-radius, etc. >>> >> >> Maybe when having to give both in a property name, we could make it >> contextual so that block is first, inline is second, i.e. >> border-start-end-radius ? >> > > I think this makes sense, personally. > > ~fantasai > In Sass we allow properties sharing a prefix to be nested. Maybe this is something CSS should consider: div { border: { width: 8px; radius: 50px; start: { shape: circle; } } } Chris
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 17:03:16 UTC