- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:22:00 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/19/2015 05:20 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 06:38:18 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > >> Cameron McCormack wrote: >>> Is there any reason not to have logical versions of the border radius >>> properties? >> >> dbaron points out to me that the names of the properties would be pretty bad, if we follow the existing naming scheme: >> border-block-start-inline-end-radius, etc. > > Maybe when having to give both in a property name, we could make it contextual so that block is first, inline is second, i.e. > border-start-end-radius ? I think this makes sense, personally. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 09:22:26 UTC