W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-ruby] collapse ruby-position values

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:52:10 -0500
Message-ID: <54BEDC1A.6090506@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/20/2015 02:07 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org <mailto:liam@w3.org>> wrote:
>     > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900
>     > Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     >> I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and
>     >> "inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better
>     >> than "over" and "under" here?
>     >
>     > Do over and under work equally well for horizontal and vertical text?
>
>     Yes, it's defined in Writing Modes Level 3, 6.3. Line-relative Directions[1].
>
>
> Great. Then I'm fine with "over | under | inter-character".

I'm okay with this. If we need to, we can expand the values in L2.

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:53:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:50 UTC