- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:52:10 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/20/2015 02:07 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org <mailto:liam@w3.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900 > > Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com <mailto:kojiishi@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >> I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and > >> "inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better > >> than "over" and "under" here? > > > > Do over and under work equally well for horizontal and vertical text? > > Yes, it's defined in Writing Modes Level 3, 6.3. Line-relative Directions[1]. > > > Great. Then I'm fine with "over | under | inter-character". I'm okay with this. If we need to, we can expand the values in L2. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:53:09 UTC