W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-ruby] collapse ruby-position values

From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:07:05 +1100
Message-ID: <CAMdq699dVVU4TF46XdK+Rt03xz2JsPP41uvXqnT2TGMGxOGYzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900
> > Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and
> >> "inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better
> >> than "over" and "under" here?
> >
> > Do over and under work equally well for horizontal and vertical text?
>
> Yes, it's defined in Writing Modes Level 3, 6.3. Line-relative
> Directions[1].
>

Great. Then I'm fine with "over | under | inter-character".

- Xidorn
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 07:08:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:56 UTC