W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [css-ruby] collapse ruby-position values

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:04:32 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbX5-GN6uj_K92Uv-=-5Ftrx5mpywpcg4MfsRQtVw2GJ=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Cc: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:54:08 +0900
> Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I meant I'm good with only three values, but "over", "under", and
>> "inter-character". Why do you think "start" and "end" works better
>> than "over" and "under" here?
>
> Do over and under work equally well for horizontal and vertical text?

Yes, it's defined in Writing Modes Level 3, 6.3. Line-relative Directions[1].

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/#line-directions

/koji
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 07:04:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:50 UTC