- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:55:03 -0500
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/20/2015 08:59 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > I'm a little concerned about this syntax, because "ruby-position" is currently a property applied to <rtc>. The "alternate" > doesn't seem like something should be there. The value is effectively only "over", "under", and "inter-character" for > ruby-position. "alternate" seems more likely to be something applied on <ruby>s. > > Even if we want this syntax, I guess we probably shouldn't use "||" here if the "over | under" is for the first level. > Probably "[ over | under ] [ alternate ]?" is better. It applies to <rtc>, but it inherits, so it could very well have been specified on <ruby> or even <html>. Also, we try to avoid requiring particular order of keywords when parsing is ambiguous. I think in most cases people can just write: ruby-position: alternate; but if they want it to start on a different side, then ruby-position: under alternate; Open to other ideas, though. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 03:55:32 UTC