- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:29:03 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 10/23/2014 06:53 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 10/23/2014 02:51 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: >> The spec text in question is: >> # For every unfrozen item on the line, multiply its >> # flex shrink factor by its outer flex base size, >> # and note this as its scaled flex shrink factor. >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#scaled-flex-shrink-factor > > Side note: the spec text that I'm asking about (above) is also > contradicted by a different chunk of spec text, from the definition of > 'flex-shrink': > > # The flex shrink factor is multiplied by the > # flex basis when distributing negative space. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#flex-shrink-factor > > We should make these consistent about "flex basis" vs. "outer flex base > size". Those terms can refer to very different quantities, particularly > when margins/border/padding are involved. I just used "flex base size" and turned it into a note. Hopefully that's sufficient. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 03:29:30 UTC