- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:48:58 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/20/2015 06:35 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > >> On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:59 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >> I put in a rough draft of the dominant-baseline, alignment-baseline, >> and baseline-shift properties from SVG into CSS Inline: >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-inline/#line-height >> >> Comments welcome. >> >> ~fantasai > > 'Baseline-shift: baseline' seems odd and unnecessary. 'Baseline-shift: 0' should be enough, and reads better. Then say somewhere that 'vertical-align:baseline' is equal to 'vertical-align:baseline 0'. I think that is more clear than explaining 'vertical-align:baseline baseline'. > > Even if SVG is different in this regard, it shouldn't impact SVG much to have it this way in CSS. Good catch. I really want to trim down the silly things we're inheriting from SVG inasmuch as possible, and I think this is also one of the things we can cut out. I changed the initial value to zero and added a line allowing SVG UAs to support ''baseline'' as computing to 0 if they need to. If we hear back it's not needed, we can remove it. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2015 00:49:27 UTC